OK. So, Goldman Sachs holds some private events and they hire HRC to speak for an hour and pay her 675K for 3 speeches, this is not contested. Now what we’re asked believe is that; Goldman may think they buying influence or access but our noble candidate will not be bought. That type of thing only happens in GOP circles. Not only that, but it is Hillary that has the stronger regulation plans for Wall Street and it is she that has them quaking in their boots. After all she is the “progressive who can get things done”, and she went down there to Wall Street before the crash and told them to “cut it out”.
So the question is this; why hasn’t Goldman Sachs released the transcripts or videos of the events that they undoubtedly have?
Seriously, if Goldman was really against Hillary or scared of her at all, they could sink her campaign right now. It also seem odd that of the few hundred people at these speeches there’s been only one person who commented on them. THat person did so anonymously and off the record to Politico. He/she claimed that Clinton spoke glowingly of the company and “sounded like a managing director”. If there was any debate inside Goldman about which candidate would be tougher to deal with, between Hillary and Bernie, there would be more than a few people coming forward to talk about the speeches. It seems inside Goldman there’s a near universal hush order around the Clinton speeches. Curious….